Skip to content

bigstock-Silhouette-1113353Alaska law requires an injured employee to report his injury to his employer within 30 days.  AS 23.30.100.  If the employee fails to report his injury timely, his failure to do so can bar his claim.  That means that he won't get any benefits.  That is the general rule.

There are exceptions.  The first exception is when the Alaska Workers Compensation Board determines that the employer was not prejudiced by a delay in reporting the injury. AS 23.30.100 (d)(1).  This means you have to go to a hearing and get a ruling.

When is the employer prejudiced by late notice?  If he is unable to investigate the circumstances of the injury because of the delay, if he is unable to investigate prior medical conditions of the employee because of the delay, if evidence is lost or witnesses disappear.

If the insurance company refuses to pay your claim because it says that you failed to give notice, that isn't the end of your claim.  It's the beginning of your fight.  Meet with an attorney and explain the reasons why you gave late notice.   "Lack of prejudice" is just one of a number of reasons for which the Board will excuse failure to give timely notice.

For more information, see http://keenanpowell.com/faq-wc.html.

Keenan Powell has more than 30 years experience representing injured Alaskans.  For a free consultation, call the Law Office of Keenan Powell: 907 258 7663.

xray

 

Can you pursue a personal injury claim when you get hurt at work?  The answer is: sometimes.

As a general rule, you do not have a personal injury claim against your employer or a co-worker.   Nor do you have a choice as to whether to pursue a personal injury claim instead of a workers compensation claim.  The Alaska Legislature passed a law taking that right away from you.  It's reasoning is that it's better for everyone, the employees and employers alike, to provide workers compensation rights instead of personal injury rights.  Its better for the employee because you can collect benefits even if the injury is your fault, even if you can't prove how the injury happened, even if no one was negligent.  In all those circumstances, you would lose a personal injury claim.  Workers Compensation is also better for the employee because the process is much faster and dependable.  It's better for the employer because he will have insurance to cover the employee's benefits and because he knows he won't be hit with a huge verdict that could bankrupt him and put him out of the business.

But that is just the general rule.  There are many exceptions.  One common exception is if you are in a car accident that is someone else's fault and that someone is not a co-employee.  In that case you can collect workers compensation AND pursue a personal injury claim.

You have the same rights if you were injured on someone else's premises (not owned by your employer), such as slipping and falling on ice.  Even if you slipped at fell at your workplace, if someone other than your employer owns the building, then you can collect workers compensation AND pursue a personal injury claim.

If you have any questions regarding your case, the Law Office of Keenan Powell provides free consultations regardless of whether or not you have been controverted.   To contact Keenan Powell, use the contact form on this page or call 258-7663.

For more information about Workers Compensation, see:  http://www.keenanpowell.com/faq‑wc.html.

 

gavel-books

 

Some insurance companies provide an "prescription card" to the injured worker to facilitate the filling of prescriptions.  The injured worker is then required to go to one of the pharmacies which accept the card, present it and, in theory, the prescription would be filled immediately.

It doesn't always work.   Frequently the pharmacist will tell the injured worker that the prescription must be "pre-approved" by the insurance company and that it called for authorization. This means waiting 3 days or more to get the prescription filled.

Then the injured worker calls the insurance company to complain and is told that the insurance company does not have a duty to pre-approve prescriptions and if the injured worker is having difficulty with the card, he can pay for the medications himself and submit a request for  reimbursement and wait 30 days for the reimbursement.

Two obvious problems with the insurance companies' instructions: first, the injured worker probably can't afford the prescriptions. Second, and most importantly, that is not the law.

Recently I won a case before the Board, King v UTI, in which the Board said that the prescription must be filled "promptly" and "promptly" means when the prescription is presented to the pharmacy.

The Alaska Supreme Court agreed last week in the decision of Harris v M-K Rivers. In that case, a man who was rendered paraplegic needed a special kind of bed for his bedsores.  The insurance company refused to pre-authorize it so he didn't get it.  The Supreme Court held that because the insurance company did not have a good faith basis to controvert the bed, and failing to pre-authorize the bed essentially prevented him from getting it and because of that penalties should be assessed against the insurance company.

If you're having problems with your prescriptions or any other questions or concerns regarding your workers compensation claim, call me, Keenan Powell.   I have more than 30 years experience fighting for the rights of injured Alaskans. Consultations are FREE.  Call 258-7663.

 

bigstock-Silhouette-1113353

After you’re injured at work, you can expect to receive a letter from the insurance company with several releases.   Do you have to sign them?

Maybe. It depends on what they are asking for.

Medical Release:  The insurance company is entitled to all of the medical records relating to treatment of you work injury.  Also, as a general rule, the insurance company is entitled to all of your medical records relating to the body part that was injured from two years prior to the date of injury.  There is a form on the Alaska Workers Compensation Board’s website which has been drafted by the Board.  Release of Medical Information

If the insurance company’s form looks like the Board’s form and is limited to the body part injured at work and from two years prior to your date of injury, it’s appropriate.  Additionally, certain providers (like Alaska Regional and Providence) insist on their own forms.  As long as these forms are limited to the body part injured at work and from two years prior to your date of injury, they are appropriate.

Employment Records Release: The insurance company is entitled to a list of your employers during the preceding ten years and an employment records release allowing them to speak with your prior employers IF you are applying for reemployment benefits.  As a general rule, they are not entitled to this information unless you are applying for reemployment benefits.

If you have questions about your workers compensation claim, call my office.  I have more than 30 years experience fighting for the rights of injured Alaskans. Consultations are FREE.  Call 258-7663.

xrayWhen you are referred for a PPI rating, the doctor will review your medical records, perhaps examine you, perhaps review a Physical Capacity Evaluation, and then refer to the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (6th edition) which lists nearly every kind of injury that can occur to a person and instructs the doctor how to evaluate the injury.  The Alaska Workers Compensation Board mandates the use of the AMA Guidelines, there is no getting around it.  However the doctor does have some discretion in classifying your injury based upon many factors, one of which is the amount of pain created by the injury.  Therefor it is important for the doctor to have all of your medical records, including your MRIs and x-rays, as well as a full knowledge of how the injury has impacted your life.

If you disagree with the insurance doctor's PPI rating, you can ask your own physician to review it and to refer you to someone who will do a PPI rating on your behalf.

If it has been some time since your injury and you are no longer being treated, or your treatment is only for pain and isn't going to improve your underlying condition, and you haven't been referred for a PPI rating yet, ask your doctor to do so.

The Law Office of Keenan Powell provides one FREE CONSULTATION regardless of whether or not you have been controverted.   To contact Keenan Powell, use the contact form on this page or call 258-7663.

For more information about Workers Compensation, see: http://www.keenanpowell.com/faq‑wc.html.

www.keenanpowell.com/faq-wc.htl

 

 

bigstock-Silhouette-1113353

There’s been a recommendation for surgery.  The surgeon’s office calls the insurance company requesting it to pre-authorize the surgery so the surgeon knows he’s going to get paid.  Then the insurance company either flatly refuses to pre-authorize the surgery or doesn’t return the surgeon’s call.

So the employee can’t get the surgery and can’t go back to work because the doctor won’t release him to full duty.  Meanwhile, his employer has replaced him.

If the employee can get an adjuster on the phone, the adjuster tells him that the insurance company does not have a duty to pre-authorize medical treatment.  The adjuster suggests that the surgeon go ahead and perform the surgery and the insurance company might pay the bill afterwards knowing, of course, the surgeon won’t do that.  Or, the adjuster will suggest, the employee can pay for the surgery himself and ask for reimbursement.  Like, who has the money for that?

This situation is so common that over twenty years ago, the Supreme Court for the State of Alaska ruled an injured worker who has been receiving medical treatment should have the right to prospective determination of compensability.  Summers v Korobkin Construction, 814 P 2d 1369 (Alaska, 1991).

That means filing a claim.

It also means you can get an attorney.  The second thing the insurance company is trying to do, other than denying medical benefits, is preventing the injured employee from finding a lawyer to represent him.  When you call for an attorney, most lawyers will ask “Have you been controverted?”  That means have you received a formal Notice of Controversion (a document) from the insurance company.  If the answer is no, many attorneys aren’t interested in the case because, as a rule, the attorney cannot bet paid if the claim hasn’t been controverted.

But there are formal and informal controversions.  If the insurance company has resisted paying benefits, then its action constitutes a “controversion in fact” and justifies an award of fees.

If you hit a wall when you tell the person answering the attorney’s phone that the claim has not been controverted, call another attorney. Keenan Powell has more than 30 years experience fighting for the rights of injured Alaskans.

At the Law Office of Keenan Powell, you can get a free consultation by call 258-7663.

Joseph Heller's quote is as true in workers compensation as it is in real life.  There are individuals, and companies, who make a living following around injured employees to "detect" the injured employee acting "not injured".  In fact, the 2013 ACS yellow pages lists at least 19 such companies which is about twice as many orthopedic physicians listed.

Not surprising then that the insurance companies spend a lot of money on defense, and that amount is increasing, as the amount paid to injured workers is decreasing.

So if you were injured at work and you think someone is following you around, you probably right.  Things you should look for: a man or woman walking towards you wearing baseball caps (cameras can be hidden inside), or walking around you carrying briefcases (camera inside) or a newspaper folded under his arm (camera hidden in the newspaper).

You should also be aware of people  in cars.  In the last case where I obtained video surveillance of my client, the "investigators" followed him from his house to his house, video'd him walking into the doctor's office, and out of the doctor's office, smoking a cigarette outside a building, and driving home again. The investigator's report claimed my client did not look injured but when I watched the video, it was obvious that he was.  The Workers Compensation Board agreed with me.

I've also seen videos of my clients pumping gas and carrying milk out of the grocery store.

Try to be aware of nondescript cars or trucks that seem to be everywhere.  Try to be aware of someone sitting in a car outside your home.  Go out, talk to him, get his name, ask him if he's lost or looking for someone, take his photo with your phone, get his license plate number. It's a lousy private investigator who gets caught.

And look for a lawyer because the insurance company is building a case to terminate your benefits.

If you have any questions regarding your case, the Law Office of Keenan Powell provides free consultations regardless of whether or not you have been controverted. To contact Keenan Powell, use the contact form on this page or call 258-7663.

For more information about Workers Compensation, see: http://www.keenanpowell.com/faq-wc.html.

 

Representative Stoltz (R-Chugiak) is introducing a resolution to elect the state's Attorney General and limit his (or her) terms.

The Attorney General is the highest office for the State's law department.  The person who occupies that office advises the Governor and supervises the law department making decisions on how to staff the law department. For instance when a former Lt. Governor refused to certify any voter petitions to change the law for election, the department of law created an elections section and staffed it.  It seems to have been absorbed since then.

Generally the Attorney General is appointed from a small list of the elected Governor's friends and supporters. The problem with this system is rather than have the Attorney General exercise independent legal judgment and advise the Governor regarding the constitutionality of what he (or she) wants to do, the Attorney General becomes part of the Governor's team and instead seeks ways to advance the Governor's platforms.

So electing an Attorney General would introduce the opportunity for independence between the Attorney General and the Governor.

On the other hand, the person who is elected will be another politician, someone who has the support and funds to campaign and someone who may have higher ambitions thereby introducing the opportunity for someone to use the Attorney General's office to advance his (or her) own career.

In the final analysis, if the Attorney General is elected we might get a good attorney in there.  The current system discourages that.  For more information: http://www.ktuu.com/news/news/resolution-could-make-attorney-general-elected-position/-/21043658/23916646/-/47xfqn/-/index.html.

 

Chilkoot Charlies is being sued for serving an intoxicated person, who then drove drunk and killed someone:

http://www.ktuu.com/news/news/family-sues-chilkoot-charlies-after-womans-death-in-dui-crash/-/21043658/23813320/-/e40astz/-/index.html

Not surprisingly, Chilkoot Charlies, which makes a fortune from serving intoxicated people, refuses to accept responsibility for the natural consequences of doing so.  It will be up to a jury to decide whether the bar can reap the benefits of its profitable industry without sharing in the responsibility.

Keenan Powell has more than 30 years experience representing injured Alaskans in Anchorage and the Valley. For a free consultation, fill out the contact form or call 907 258 7663.